Chandrika rule

OBSERVERS believe that it would be difficult for President Chandrika to repeat her 1994 presidential election performance, when she received 62.3% of the votes, boosted by minority support. The LTTE, who were holding peace talks with the government at the time, provided tacit support. But now they are at full-scale war with government forces. Her government is plagued by internal dissent and her plans to end the war by solving the ethnic conflict and replace the current presidential system by a Westminster-style cabinet government, are in tatters, providing ammunition to the opposition.

The minority parties are reluctant to offer support and there are attempts to put forward one candidate to represent all the Tamil parties. The two parties that would unconditionally support President Chandrika seem to be the Sri Lanka Muslim Congress and Hill Country’s Ceylon Workers Congress (CWC). But the death of CWC leader and Livestock Development minister S Thondaman, 87, on 30 October has pushed the government further into crisis. The Tamil parties say that during the five-year Chandrika rule, Tamil civilians have suffered extreme restriction on freedom of movement and violations of human rights by security forces. They argue that under such conditions, election campaign in the Army-controlled north-east is futile and elections in LTTE areas is impossible.

The parties have severely criticized the government for the 12% increase in the defence expenditure for the year 2000, which will be a staggering Rs 52.4 billion ($728 million). The launch of Operation Watershed in the Vanni, in an attempt to turn the military campaign to political advantage has backfired. Despite all these problems, analysts say, UNP candidate Ranil Wickremasinghe will not be able to match her public appeal.


Next article.
Back to Sri Lanka Monitor Index page
Back to The Refugee Council Welcome page